Skip to content
Bencher

TestsBenchmarks · Multimodal

Chartography (no tools)

Surge AI chart-reading benchmark, no tools.

% solvedHigher is betterThe test's websiteOfficial page ↗

The best 5 · 5 models tested

Top 5 · best setting per model · 5 models, 5 results (1 independent)

Measured by independent testersIndependent Reported by the makerVendor-reported
Chartography (no tools) leaderboard
Thinking levelSetting
1Gemini 4 ArgonGoogle (Gemini / DeepMind)71.6%Maxhighest thinking settingsMaker's own figureVendor-reportedGoogle ↗—30 Sep 2026
2Claude Opus 5.5Anthropic64.4%Maxadaptive thinking, effort=maxMaker's own figureVendor-reportedAnthropic ↗—28 Sep 2026
3Claude Sonnet 5.5Anthropic61.6%Maxadaptive thinking, effort=maxMaker's own figureVendor-reportedAnthropic ↗—28 Sep 2026
4GPT-6 SolOpenAI53.6%Defaultas listed by Anthropic (effort not stated)Independent testIndependentSurge AI (via Anthropic launch post) ↗—28 Sep 2026
5Claude Sonnet 5Anthropic15.6%Maxadaptive thinking, effort=maxMaker's own figureVendor-reportedAnthropic ↗—28 Sep 2026